An analysis of manipulation in julius caesar by william shakespeare

Political decisions were made through public debate and persuasive argument, and in theory the ideas that would be best for Rome would prevail rather than the will of one ruler.

At the beginning of the play the Republican mode of government is under serious threat, since Julius Caesar is ruling as a dictator and may soon be crowned as a king.

But Brutus makes the fatal error of allowing Antony to speak, because he is still deluded about himself and his own actions, clinging to the idea that he is the most honorable of Romans and that no one would dare dispute his honor. Brutus and Cassius are forced to flee Rome and the country is plunged into civil war.

We see Brutus reject his wife Portia, who represents the nobler side of his character. Both of them have weakened their own cause by continuing to display the same flaws each exhibited in the early acts.

Cassius has acted out of self-interest and now has angered Brutus by selling important offices for personal gain and refusing to send Brutus funds to raise an army. The conspirators present themselves as motivated by a desire to save the Roman Republic and overthrow tyranny, but the play teaches us not to take their claims at face value.

Most significantly, we see Cassius deliberately mislead Brutus by arranging to have fake notes left on his chair and thrown in at his window as if the people were encouraging him to rise against Caesar. The other conspirators openly admit to each other that they need Brutus to participate because they know that their actions would be seen as treasonous without his reputation to make them look better than they are.

The Republic was viewed as a high point in history, both by its participants and by those who came after, because its institutions divided power among a number of people senators and tribunes rather than concentrating it in one person. In assassinating Caesar, Brutus thinks that he is striking a blow for Republican ideals and doing what is best for Rome, but in actuality he has let himself be manipulated by Cassius and the other conspirators.

The assassination actually represents their personal grievances, fears, and self-interest more than the interest of Rome.'Brutus' will start a spirit as soon as 'Caesar.' () Cassius seems to think that by playing on his desire for personal glory, he can sway Brutus to join the conspirators. The thing is, we're not sure if Brutus is interested in self-gain.

(Click the themes infographic to download.). In Julius Caesar, manipulation is almost a professional mi-centre.comcians use their rhetorical skills to gain power and to influence large, fickle crowds, and seeming friends lie outright to each other.

In the play "Julius Caesar", Shakespeare displays his characters as being manipulative and persuasive.

Manipulation and Deception in Shakespeare’s “Julius Caesar”

This is illustrated in various parts of the play, such as at the beginning when Brutus was manipulated by Cassius, and 4/5(2). William Shakespeare’s play “The Tragedy of Julius Caesar” illustrates many chaotic characteristics of Ancient Rome, such as conspiracies, treacheries, and gory battles.

"Julius Caesar" by Shakespeare - An Analysis of the Themes of Power, Manipulation, and Ambition. Tragedy of Julius Caesar” William Shakespeare uses Brutus, Cassius, Casca, Trebonius, Ligarius, Decvius and Cimber to create drama throughout the play.

Julius Caesar tells the story of how the Roman Republic came to its end. The Republic was viewed as a high point in history, both by its participants and by those who came after, because its institutions divided power among a number of people (senators and tribunes) rather than concentrating it in one person.

Download
An analysis of manipulation in julius caesar by william shakespeare
Rated 5/5 based on 53 review